Order5

I think I shared music form the first game a long time ago...maybe even on the old forums. Regardless, the second game came out:
Nights of Azure 2: Bride of the New Moon - War Love Song

WEST
-Most of the server is retired.
-Time zone is 2 hours behind East.
-There's a five-guild alliance.
-Home to many famous and heroic Fiona players, like the SAO Fiona, the 20k DEF Fiona, the Fiona who unites galaxies, the Fiona who's name is just fun to say a certain way...

EDIT:
Funny how my post is time-stamped 44 minutes ahead of CometCupid's above post.

RE-EDIT:
Time stamp fixes, very good Nexon.

Saygo wrote: »

Q: What happens if there are multiple characters with the same name?

A: In cases of duplicate names, the character with the most playtime will retain their original name, with character creation date serving as the tiebreaker. All other characters with that name will have "EA_", "WE_" or "AU_" added to the front of their name. They will also be granted a free Name Change Coupon, so that they can select a new name at their leisure.

AFK time...

EDIT:
Additionally, it says that if we end up having more than 20 characters after the merge, we will retain access to all of them...are they doing away with the character selection screen or...what would a screen with 60 characters look like? I don't think I've ever seen 60 characters on the same screen before - even during big GM events or Lann/Vella bot gatherings on the docks.

Perhaps there is a level restriction since most sub-stories begin unlocking at level 10. I have no intention of testing this out, but perhaps this insight might be helpful.

LynnCUBE wrote: »

...

But recently, it has been reported frequently that players are abusing the kick system in Quick Battle to kick players out of their party in order to get their friends or guild members to join, and wasting the players time who wants a fast party / battle.

We want the Quick Battle to work as intended, and therefore will remove the right to kick in Quick Battle.

But, players are allowed to vote to kick other players. They can right click, select Kick, enter a reason and submit a vote to kick for the entire party. There is a cooldown in the new kick vote system, so players cannot submit another kick vote directly after one.

Once again,
if you want to gather a party with different stat requirement, with friends, or with guild, you should create a party through the battle board not through Quick Battle and cause other players inconveniences.

...

Source

Nexon KR already stated months ago that it doesn't like how people are abusing the +1 core system, and that it was meant to reward the fact that you would be working with strangers instead of a well-coordinated group. MisterWhiskers and Tayla are both correct though, and the system was developed to try and cover both interpretations of "join-and-GO" and "Quick access to a Battle". However, the "Quick access to a Battle" interpretation is mostly rooted in the fact that you can depart from anywhere, which is one of the reasons why you still have the option to create your own premade party from any board instead of doing Quick Battle.

Regardless, I am largely in agreement with Prototypemind on the vote-to-kick changes; I don't think this will help get people to play together. As for purposed changes, I have always been in favor of +1 core for guild-only runs because that's what guilds should behave like: doing stuff together. I've been the last member of Aberrant for so long, and it's honestly silly that the game doesn't encourage me more to be part of an active guild (I still get all the guild bonuses, I can receive Guild Feathers from all my friends in other guilds, I get the guild storage all to myself, etc.).