Puppyman

mayoungjohn wrote: »

I think they are not releasing Blute on purpose , and keep releasing lame events to maintain players. I don't think I've seen this much threads about that single weapon or class before. So they KNOW players will keep playing until the Blute release. Guess what nexon? I'm not playing until u guys release it. Really really bad idea to maintain players.

...

Blute came out in August for Kr along with the seal shop update [Bonus: we got seal shop reeeeaal early]
6 months is the standard time NA has always taken to get major content out from Kr: Miri[June], Aes[July], Dullahan, s3 raids and story, characters, secondaries, s2 raids, except lolRise

6 months from august issssss.... February. [(1) Sept, (2) Oct, (3) Nov, (4) Dec, (5) Jan...]
I already knew since August that it was coming out in February, which gave me lots of time to prepare my Lynn, but also to hype myself for it.
And that hype has only grown exponentially as we got and get closer!

Now, the reason sooo many threads are about Blute, including my lovely worthwhile timesink of a major guide, is because IT'S AMAZING!
It's so gooood, like soooo fun, maybe not for everyone's taste, but compared to the just before joke of a weapon: Teide, compared to what it could have been (*cough* Balor *cough*) it's so great and especially for Lynn.

---

Proof:

Puppyman wrote: »

It's not even in KR yet, only in test server. Expect in 6 months. Like all other content (With the single exception of RISE*).

*Not directed to you*
It would be nice if Future content section had a pinned thread whose title was "KR receives content 6 months before we do"

And shameless plug:

Puppyman wrote: »

So I polished and finished my brief overview covering Blütte Lynn now that she has hit live servers and has had some fine tweaking. I didn't get into heavy specifics like exact values and what not, but it gives people the basic idea of the weapon. Feel free to ask here for more nitty gritty specifics

This is Link

It's time boisss























got ya agen

ArcticAzreal wrote: »

Wedding outfits arent so pretty either . Where are the nice outfitters? Other then gotchas.

Like the snowflake coat


need the top for my lynn

Bad analogy is bad but I want to make it cause I thought of it and it won't leave my head

Devon gets 3 friends: Michael, Tom, and Jane, to help stack some boxes of dog food from the storage, and offers to pay them for their efforts.

Tom and Jane stack the boxes fairly well. Michael on the other hand is a box stacking god.
Once all boxes in the storage have been stacked it becomes apparent that Michael stacked far more boxes on his own.
However, almost all of the boxes Michael stacked where empty, and therefore of no use to Devon.
While all the boxes Tom and Jane stacked, where filled with dog food and the ones Devon needed to be stacked.

Should they all three be payed the same amount?

Consider this:
- Michael stacked far more boxes that Tom and Jane probably ever could
- Tom and Jane are good at stacking boxes, by no means bad
- Only a tiny few of Michael's stacked boxes actually helped Devon
- They all participated and gave effort at helping Devon
-This is not a job, Devon asked for help with payment in return for said help

---

I said bad analogy was bad, and it's more aimed at the justification for doing under 1% limiting rewards.
I get y'all wanna kung-fu foight about whether it's leeching or not, but I'm focusing more on the broad picture of the rewards.

Also don't consider people more geared than you an unskilled whale, people can be geared and skilled, Neamhain proved this, just as much as people can be under geared and skilled, though strangely enough there's a weird correlation between having skill and making an exceeding effort to at least reach reasonable gearing as opposed to bear minimum and complaining

2019